slider01

 

 

 

slider01-1440x501x1
slider01-1440x501x1-1
23 October 2024
Joanne van Eenennaam |

When are personal data health data? EU Court of Justice rules

On 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice delivered an important and very surprising ruling. The case concerned the question of whether placing an order with an online pharmacy constitutes the processing of special categories of personal data within the meaning of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) or not.

The Court of Justice ruled that in this case there was indeed processing of personal data concerning health, even if the order at the online pharmacy was not intended for the person who placed the order. The Court of Justice deviated from the advice of the Advocate General at the Court of Justice in this ruling.

Court of Justice of the EU 4 October 2024 , C- 21/23, ECLI:EU:C:2024:846 ( Lindenapotheke )

The article below explains the judgment of the Court of Justice.

Why is it important whether a piece of data is personal data?

The question of whether a particular piece of data is personal data within the meaning of the GDPR has very major legal consequences. In information law, information is in principle 'free', unless there is a specific law that imposes certain rights or obligations with respect to certain information.

The General Data Protection Regulation, also known as 'the privacy law', is a famous example of a law that contains specific obligations regarding information, namely personal data. If certain data is not personal data, the GDPR and the legal obligations from the GDPR do not apply. If a data is personal data, the processing of that personal data must generally comply with the processing principles and specific rules in the GDPR.

How do I know if a piece of data is personal data?

The GDPR defines personal data as follows:

“Article 4 under 1 GDPR
Personal data” means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (“data subject”); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person;”

The answer to the question of whether a particular piece of data is personal data is very context-sensitive. For example, it is quite possible that a particular piece of data is not sufficient in itself to identify a natural person without too much effort, but that a particular piece of data can be used 'in combination' with other data to identify a natural person. This means that it is still personal data within the meaning of the GDPR, even if it does not appear to be privacy-sensitive information at first glance. Which means that the rules of the GDPR apply to the processing of that information.

The EU Court of Justice previously also ruled that facts and circumstances surrounding a particular company or organisation may be relevant. In the sense that a particular piece of data that is not personal data for most companies and organisations may be personal data for a specific party, for example because that specific party has access to certain other data through a unique role, which that party can combine to identify natural persons. This applied , for example, to the "VIN number" ( vehicle identification number ). Most companies and organizations cannot make much of such a number, but a car company may have access to other data that can be combined with the VIN number to identify a natural person, such as the owner of the car with that VIN number:

Court of Justice of the EU 9 November 2023, C-319/22, ECLI:EU:C:2023:837 ( General context Autoteile -Handel (Access to vehicle information) )

Why is it important whether a personal data is health data?

The GDPR roughly has two regimes, one for 'regular' personal data and a stricter regime for the so-called “special categories of personal data”.

The special categories of personal data are, exhaustively, the following: racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health and data concerning sex life or sexual orientation.

The processing of personal data is in principle permitted, provided that the processing principles and rules of the GDPR are observed. The processing of special categories of personal data is in principle prohibited , unless an exception to the prohibition applies in a specific situation.

“Article 9 paragraph 1 GDPR
Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.”

The exceptions to the prohibition are limited. If no exception applies, but special categories of personal data are processed, this is a very serious violation of the GDPR, which is punishable by high fines and/or liability claims.

How do I know if a personal data is health data ?

The Lindenapotheke case involved customers of an online pharmacy in Germany. Via the online pharmacy, one could order medicines, among other things. The online pharmacy did not ask for explicit consent to process health data. The explicit consent of the data subject (= natural person to whom the personal data relates) is one of the exceptions to the prohibition on processing special categories of personal data.

The main argument why there would be no processing of special categories of personal data, with regard to health, was that an order does not show that certain medicines or other medical devices are intended for the person placing the order. After all, a healthcare institution, or a patient 's relative, can also place the order for someone else. Therefore, no information with regard to health could be derived from the order. The name and delivery address of the person placing the order are not special personal data, but regular personal data that do not fall under the stricter regime. The Advocate General at the Court of Justice advised not to consider customer data from online pharmacists as health data.

However, the Court of Justice of the EU went the other way and did not follow the advice of the Advocate General. The Court of Justice of the EU ruled that a broad definition of what constitutes health data applies, also because a high level of protection is required for this type of data. Even if the order is placed for someone else, the risk remains that conclusions can be drawn about the state of health of a natural person and a high level of protection is required.

Response to the ruling

Critics point out that this ruling will result in an increasing need for explicit consent in the healthcare context, thereby increasing the administrative burden, without patients necessarily benefiting from more consent forms.

Proponents welcome the confirmation by the Court of Justice that a high level of protection applies in law within the health context and that a high level of protection is guaranteed. In a special privacy context that is as highly sensitive as health, according to the proponents this is appropriate.

In practice, almost only informed explicit consent is sufficient to make the processing of personal data concerning health lawful. Anyone who works with health data is therefore well advised to check whether this is permitted and if not, either to ask for explicit consent or to stop the possibly prohibited processing.

Questions?

Are you wondering what this ruling means for you or your organization? Do you have questions in the field of privacy or data protection law? Do you have questions about the do's and don'ts of processing special categories of personal data, such as health data? Contact our IT & privacy lawyers today . They will be happy to assist you.

Approach us for legal advice today!

Do you want to use our knowledge and call us with some regularity? Subscribe to the Virtual Legal Department. 

Interested? Call or email us:

T. +31(0)70-3819281
E. info@wisemen.nl

For the latest information, subscribe to the newsletter now

WiseMen Newsletter!

Archief

25 August 2026 (update 10 june 2026) What transparency obligations apply to AI use?
21 August 2026 New rules on the sharing of digital evidence
17 August 2026 Force majeure in IT industry-standard terms and conditions
14 August 2026 What statutory obligations apply to the deployer of high-risk AI systems?
15 June 2026 Can AI-generated output be protected by copyright?
18 May 2026 What are the consequences of the misuse of AI in legal cases? (update)
15 April 2026 Digital Omnibus Proposal: proposed amendments to the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”)
31 March 2026 Case C-97/23 P WhatsApp Ireland v European Data Protection Board
31 March 2026 What transparency obligations apply to AI use?
31 March 2026 The EU European Health Data Space Regulation has entered into force, what now?
12 March 2026 What are the consequences of misuse of AI in court cases?
22 January 2026 DEU Data Act Regulation & Exit - and Continuity Provisions in IT Contracts
17 December 2025 How does my company or organisation develop ethically responsible and reliable AI?
14 May 2025 Accessibility Directive/ European Accessibility Act (EAA).
14 January 2025 What is a critical or important function under the DORA regulation?
11 October 2024 Commercial interests as a GDPR legal basis : EU Court of Justice rules
07 March 2024 Doxing is a crime under Dutch Criminal Law as of January 1, 2024. What does that mean?
10 December 2023 The New Platform Liability: from the e-Commerce Directive to the Digital Services Act Regulation (“ DSA ”)
23 November 2023 Part I - AI & Dutch Law: How does AI and copyright law work in the Netherlands?
14 September 2023 Director personally liable for improper dismissal
04 September 2023 Naming law is also privacy law
31 July 2023 New adequacy decision personal data transfers between the US and EU
19 June 2023 What does the Blauw/Nebu case mean for practice?
02 November 2022 What is the Legal Value of NEN 7510 Certification?
24 June 2022 A practical overview of the do's and don'ts of camera use
23 June 2022 Can I scrape data from the Internet?
24 May 2022 When do you need a 'privacy statement'?
07 March 2022 Processor or (joint) controller?
23 December 2021 What is a Data Transfer Impact Assessment ("DTIA")?
14 October 2021 Consent not suffice as grounds?
02 January 2020 I understand that you prefer to sit on your boyfriend's head
03 December 2019 Interview(s) LIVE op AvdR Legalflix
17 September 2019 Can an employer require use of fingerprint scanners?
02 September 2019 Dutch AP provides practical information about processors
19 February 2019 The GDPR and freedom of expression: can everyone be a journalist?
12 February 2019 Is your software license policy in order? Do the software check (pre BSA)
10 January 2019 Right of access to personnel files
02 January 2019 Pledge on software
25 September 2017 What about the zero-hour employment contract?
20 September 2017 Be careful with descriptive trade names!
29 September 2015 What about the all-in salary payment?
16 April 2014 The added value of an IT lawyer

Paralegal
Isabella Mahieu

GDPR, IT law, International Media Law

Contact

Paralegal
MAURIJN HOES

GDPR, IT-law, intellectual property

Contact


Phoebe Schauten

 Employment law, contract law and intellectual property

Contact

Paralegal
Femke Prinsen

IT law, International Trade Law and Intellectual Property

Contact


Jules Bousema

Procurement, intellectual property, IT law, disputes and litigation

Contact


Joanne van Eenennaam

GDPR, IT-law, Corporate law, disputes and litigation

Contact


Emilie van Kempen

Employment law, Liability, disputes and litigation

Contact


Jeroen Hörters

Office Director

Contact


Henk Dekker

Intellectual property, IT-law, disputes and litigation.

Contact


Morgane Veenhuijzen

Employment law, HRM, disputes and litigation

Contact


Olaf Schauten

IT-contracts and corporate law.

Contact