slider01

 

 

 

slider01-1440x501x1
slider01-1440x501x1-1
02 January 2020
Emilie van Kempen |

I understand that you prefer to sit on your boyfriend's head

Need advice? Please call or e-mail 

+31 (0)70-3819281

info@wisemen.nl

Saying: "I understand that you prefer to sit on your boyfriend's head" reason to terminate an employment contract?

The employer has submitted a request to the court to terminate the employment contract with one of its MT members for culpable behaviour. He has often made inappropriate comments over a longer period of time, such as “Wees niet zo introvert, kut” ("Don't be so introverted, cunt") and that a colleague would have won a game of table tennis due to her cleavage. The MT member in question also, when an employee stated that she "did not like the current state of affairs", answered with "I understand that you prefer to sit on your boyfriend's head". Subsequently, a white spot on a colleague's clothing was joked in front of colleagues that “zij zich weer had laten onderspuiten” ("she had herself being sprayed again").

The relevant MT member had always been tackled about the comments. In his performance reviews it was also indicated that his communication style was not up to standard and coaching was offered, which the MT member rejected. Therefore, it was indicated that the employer could do nothing more than to terminate the employment contract after his last comment regarding sitting on the boyfriend’s head.

Corporate culture

However, the MT member in question did not agree with termination of his contract. The case has therefore been submitted to the court. 

ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2019:12738

The corporate culture is said to be very informal and student-like, whereby making ambiguous, sexually oriented or otherwise flat-footed remarks regularly occurred. The relevant MT member even substantiated this with various WhatsApp messages during the court proceedings. His comments should be seen in that context. In addition, he submitted a statement from which it would follow that behaviour was not limited to between men and that hand pangs were the order of the day, especially during drinks and outings, without any consequences being attached to this by the organization.

He also indicated that the comments in the past had limited consequences and the comment "I understand that you prefer to sit on your boyfriend's head", although it was inappropriate, was not so inappropriate that it would justify termination of the contract immediately and without compensation.

Judgement

However, the judge is of the opinion that the employee, certainly as a MT member, should have known better and should have understood that his comments were taken very serious by the employer. He had been pointed out earlier that he had to pay attention to the way he communicated and that making such inappropriate comments was not acceptable. His actions can be qualified as sexual harassment, according to the judge. The judge finds this seriously culpable behaviour. A possible corporate culture does not change this.

The employment contract with the MT member has therefore been terminated by the judge. Without awarding any compensation. Not even the transition payment, since the termination of the employment contract is the result of serious culpable behaviour or negligence on the part of the employee.

Advice!

Do you want to use our knowledge and call us with some regularity? Subscribe to the Virtual Legal Department. 

Interested? Call or email us:

T. +31(0)70-3819281
E. info@wisemen.nl

For the latest information, subscribe to the newsletter now

WiseMen Newsletter!

 

Archief

25 August 2026 (update 10 june 2026) What transparency obligations apply to AI use?
21 August 2026 New rules on the sharing of digital evidence
17 August 2026 Force majeure in IT industry-standard terms and conditions
14 August 2026 What statutory obligations apply to the deployer of high-risk AI systems?
15 June 2026 Can AI-generated output be protected by copyright?
18 May 2026 What are the consequences of the misuse of AI in legal cases? (update)
15 April 2026 Digital Omnibus Proposal: proposed amendments to the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”)
31 March 2026 Case C-97/23 P WhatsApp Ireland v European Data Protection Board
31 March 2026 What transparency obligations apply to AI use?
31 March 2026 The EU European Health Data Space Regulation has entered into force, what now?
12 March 2026 What are the consequences of misuse of AI in court cases?
22 January 2026 DEU Data Act Regulation & Exit - and Continuity Provisions in IT Contracts
17 December 2025 How does my company or organisation develop ethically responsible and reliable AI?
14 May 2025 Accessibility Directive/ European Accessibility Act (EAA).
14 January 2025 What is a critical or important function under the DORA regulation?
23 October 2024 When are personal data health data? EU Court of Justice rules
11 October 2024 Commercial interests as a GDPR legal basis : EU Court of Justice rules
07 March 2024 Doxing is a crime under Dutch Criminal Law as of January 1, 2024. What does that mean?
10 December 2023 The New Platform Liability: from the e-Commerce Directive to the Digital Services Act Regulation (“ DSA ”)
23 November 2023 Part I - AI & Dutch Law: How does AI and copyright law work in the Netherlands?
14 September 2023 Director personally liable for improper dismissal
04 September 2023 Naming law is also privacy law
31 July 2023 New adequacy decision personal data transfers between the US and EU
19 June 2023 What does the Blauw/Nebu case mean for practice?
02 November 2022 What is the Legal Value of NEN 7510 Certification?
24 June 2022 A practical overview of the do's and don'ts of camera use
23 June 2022 Can I scrape data from the Internet?
24 May 2022 When do you need a 'privacy statement'?
07 March 2022 Processor or (joint) controller?
23 December 2021 What is a Data Transfer Impact Assessment ("DTIA")?
14 October 2021 Consent not suffice as grounds?
03 December 2019 Interview(s) LIVE op AvdR Legalflix
17 September 2019 Can an employer require use of fingerprint scanners?
02 September 2019 Dutch AP provides practical information about processors
19 February 2019 The GDPR and freedom of expression: can everyone be a journalist?
12 February 2019 Is your software license policy in order? Do the software check (pre BSA)
10 January 2019 Right of access to personnel files
02 January 2019 Pledge on software
25 September 2017 What about the zero-hour employment contract?
20 September 2017 Be careful with descriptive trade names!
29 September 2015 What about the all-in salary payment?
16 April 2014 The added value of an IT lawyer

Paralegal
Isabella Mahieu

GDPR, IT law, International Media Law

Contact

Paralegal
MAURIJN HOES

GDPR, IT-law, intellectual property

Contact


Phoebe Schauten

 Employment law, contract law and intellectual property

Contact

Paralegal
Femke Prinsen

IT law, International Trade Law and Intellectual Property

Contact


Jules Bousema

Procurement, intellectual property, IT law, disputes and litigation

Contact


Joanne van Eenennaam

GDPR, IT-law, Corporate law, disputes and litigation

Contact


Emilie van Kempen

Employment law, Liability, disputes and litigation

Contact


Jeroen Hörters

Office Director

Contact


Henk Dekker

Intellectual property, IT-law, disputes and litigation.

Contact


Morgane Veenhuijzen

Employment law, HRM, disputes and litigation

Contact


Olaf Schauten

IT-contracts and corporate law.

Contact