slider01

 

 

 

slider01-1440x501x1
slider01-1440x501x1-1
23 December 2021
Joanne van Eenennaam |

What is a Data Transfer Impact Assessment ("DTIA")?

Introduction

The Data Transfer Impact Assessment ("DTIA") is a relative newcomer to the field of privacy and data protection law. The emergence of the DTIA is one of the sometimes under-reported consequences of the notorious Schrems II ruling of the Court of Justice of the EU on the transfer of personal data outside the EU.

What is a Data Transfer Impact Assessment ("DTIA") and how do you know when one ought to be conducted?

What is the background to the Data Transfer Impact Assessment?

The EU Standard Contractual Clauses ('SCCs') are one of the means under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to lawfully transfer personal data to entities located outside the EU/European Economic Area. The Dutch term for SCCs is ‘modelcontractbepalingen’. The GDPR's name for exporting personal data outside the EU/EEA is transfer to a third country.

The SCCs aim to provide the same level of protection for the fundamental rights of individuals whose personal data is transferred outside the EU/EEA as that provided by the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and related laws and regulations. Such a level of protection is achieved by means of appropriate safeguards, enforceable rights and effective legal remedies for the data subject.

However, there is a problem with the use of SCCs to achieve adequate safeguards, enforceable rights and effective remedies for data subjects outside the EU/EEA. Due to their contractual nature, SCCs are not binding on the local authorities of a third country, as those local authorities are not party to the agreement incorporating the SCCs. Risks that may arise as a result of this reality include:

  • the risk that the laws or practices of the third country may prevent either party from complying with the contents of the SCCs;
  • the risk that local authorities (il)legitimately demand disclosure of or access to personal data;
  • The risk that local laws and practices prevent the return or destruction of personal data.

The DTIA is part of the fulfilment of the responsibilities of a party that wishes to export personal data outside the EU/European Economic Area. Performing a DTIA in advance serves to map out the risks that play or may play a role in a planned transfer of personal data to a third country. 

To whom does the obligation to carry out a Data Transfer Impact Assessment apply?

The controller and/or processor within the meaning of the GDPR are obliged to examine the risk to the level of protection for the rights of data subjects when transferring their personal data to a third country. If the risk to the rights of data subjects is unacceptably high, additional measures must be taken in addition to the SCCs that have been established.

If it is not possible to take sufficient additional measures to restore the required level of protection, the controller and/or processor shall be ultimately obliged to suspend or terminate the transfer of personal data to the third country. The national data protection authority may also order the suspension or termination of the transfer of personal data on grounds of incompatibility between the laws and practices of the SCC and the locally applicable laws and practices.

When concluding standard contractual clauses, the Parties are obligated to ensure that they have no reason to believe that the laws and practices of the third country prevent the data importer from fulfilling its obligations under the SCCs.

What topics should be assessed in a Data Transfer Impact Assessment?

When providing the guarantees required under SCCs to protect the rights of data subjects in case of transfer of their personal data to a third country, the Parties declare to have taken into account the following elements:

  • The specific circumstances of the transfer
  • The legislation and practices of the third country
  • any relevant contractual, technical or organisational safeguards that complement the guarantee under the SCCs

SCCs require the Parties to document the assessment. The DTIA can serve as this documentation.

In addition, an element of the assessment shall be the relevant and documented practical experience of past cases of disclosure requests by local authorities, in particular internal records or other documentation continuously compiled in accordance with due diligence and certified at senior management level. Provided that the practical experience can be corroborated by other relevant objective elements, is appropriately weighted in terms of representativeness and does not contradict publicly available information on the application of foreign law in practice within the same sector in case law and reports of independent oversight bodies.

What are the consequences if a Data Transfer Impact Assessment is not carried out?

Fines and liability

If a DTIA is not performed when it should have been, the data exporter and the data importer risk having fines imposed on them by the national supervisory authority, in the Netherlands the 'Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens'. Data subjects can also hold parties liable under the GDPR on their own initiative if they have suffered material or immaterial damage as a result of a transfer to a third country in which their rights were inadequately safeguarded. In short, it is very wise to check whether a DTIA is necessary before proceeding with a transfer of personal data outside the EU and to actually implement and document it.

What is the difference between a Data Transfer Impact Assessment ("DTIA") and a Data Protection Impact Assessment ("DPIA")?

The Data Protection Impact Assessment ("DPIA") is by now a familiar concept to many companies and organisations. It is important not to confuse these two types of risk assessment. The DPIA and the DTIA cover different risks and scenarios, although obviously both could be carried out simultaneously or in combination. A Data Protection Impact Assessment is mandatory when there is likely to be a high risk to the privacy of data subjects, including in the case of large-scale, systematic and systematic processing of personal data. Even when a Data Protection Impact Assessment is not legally required under the GDPR, it may be wise to have one carried out before commencing with the large-scale processing of (particularly or sensitive) personal data.

Conclusion

The Data Transfer Impact Assessment may be required when your organisation intends to transfer personal data to an entity in a third country outside the EU based on standard contractual clauses, for which the European Commission has not issued an adequacy decision. For transfers of personal data to third countries outside the EU, it is important that the same level of protection as under the GDPR is maintained through appropriate safeguards, enforceable rights and effective legal remedies for the data subjects. Due to the contractual nature of the standard contractual clauses, there are various risks that the local authorities and legislation of the third country will undermine the protection offered by the SCCs. When using the SCCs, the parties give an assurance that they have assessed and documented whether there is a risk that they will not be able to meet the contractual safeguards contained in the SCCs. The DTIA is the name for this risk assessment by the parties and, if done properly, can serve as the required documentation.

In order to avoid fines or liability claims when your organisation intends to transfer personal data to a third country outside the EU/EEA, it is wise to check whether you need to perform a DTIA.

Do you need a Data Transfer Impact Assessment? Do you have sufficient insight into the data flows of personal data from and to your organisation? Does your organisation export personal data outside the European Economic Area or are there plans to do so?

Advice!

Do you want to use our knowledge and call us with some regularity? Subscribe to the Virtual Legal Department. 

Interested? Call or email us:

T. +31(0)70-3819281
E. info@wisemen.nl

For the latest information, subscribe to the newsletter now

WiseMen Newsletter!

Archief

25 August 2026 (update 10 june 2026) What transparency obligations apply to AI use?
21 August 2026 New rules on the sharing of digital evidence
17 August 2026 Force majeure in IT industry-standard terms and conditions
14 August 2026 What statutory obligations apply to the deployer of high-risk AI systems?
15 June 2026 Can AI-generated output be protected by copyright?
18 May 2026 What are the consequences of the misuse of AI in legal cases? (update)
15 April 2026 Digital Omnibus Proposal: proposed amendments to the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”)
31 March 2026 Case C-97/23 P WhatsApp Ireland v European Data Protection Board
31 March 2026 What transparency obligations apply to AI use?
31 March 2026 The EU European Health Data Space Regulation has entered into force, what now?
12 March 2026 What are the consequences of misuse of AI in court cases?
22 January 2026 DEU Data Act Regulation & Exit - and Continuity Provisions in IT Contracts
17 December 2025 How does my company or organisation develop ethically responsible and reliable AI?
14 May 2025 Accessibility Directive/ European Accessibility Act (EAA).
14 January 2025 What is a critical or important function under the DORA regulation?
23 October 2024 When are personal data health data? EU Court of Justice rules
11 October 2024 Commercial interests as a GDPR legal basis : EU Court of Justice rules
07 March 2024 Doxing is a crime under Dutch Criminal Law as of January 1, 2024. What does that mean?
10 December 2023 The New Platform Liability: from the e-Commerce Directive to the Digital Services Act Regulation (“ DSA ”)
23 November 2023 Part I - AI & Dutch Law: How does AI and copyright law work in the Netherlands?
14 September 2023 Director personally liable for improper dismissal
04 September 2023 Naming law is also privacy law
31 July 2023 New adequacy decision personal data transfers between the US and EU
19 June 2023 What does the Blauw/Nebu case mean for practice?
02 November 2022 What is the Legal Value of NEN 7510 Certification?
24 June 2022 A practical overview of the do's and don'ts of camera use
23 June 2022 Can I scrape data from the Internet?
24 May 2022 When do you need a 'privacy statement'?
07 March 2022 Processor or (joint) controller?
14 October 2021 Consent not suffice as grounds?
02 January 2020 I understand that you prefer to sit on your boyfriend's head
03 December 2019 Interview(s) LIVE op AvdR Legalflix
17 September 2019 Can an employer require use of fingerprint scanners?
02 September 2019 Dutch AP provides practical information about processors
19 February 2019 The GDPR and freedom of expression: can everyone be a journalist?
12 February 2019 Is your software license policy in order? Do the software check (pre BSA)
10 January 2019 Right of access to personnel files
02 January 2019 Pledge on software
25 September 2017 What about the zero-hour employment contract?
20 September 2017 Be careful with descriptive trade names!
29 September 2015 What about the all-in salary payment?
16 April 2014 The added value of an IT lawyer

Paralegal
Isabella Mahieu

GDPR, IT law, International Media Law

Contact

Paralegal
MAURIJN HOES

GDPR, IT-law, intellectual property

Contact


Phoebe Schauten

 Employment law, contract law and intellectual property

Contact

Paralegal
Femke Prinsen

IT law, International Trade Law and Intellectual Property

Contact


Jules Bousema

Procurement, intellectual property, IT law, disputes and litigation

Contact


Joanne van Eenennaam

GDPR, IT-law, Corporate law, disputes and litigation

Contact


Emilie van Kempen

Employment law, Liability, disputes and litigation

Contact


Jeroen Hörters

Office Director

Contact


Henk Dekker

Intellectual property, IT-law, disputes and litigation.

Contact


Morgane Veenhuijzen

Employment law, HRM, disputes and litigation

Contact


Olaf Schauten

IT-contracts and corporate law.

Contact